I believe the two workable strategies for the next lockdown are the same as they were for the last one:
1. Live your life as normally as you can, ignoring all the directives. Be as self reliant as possible and learn how to fix stuff. Exercise, eat healthy food, avoid dangerous drugs including alcohol, and manage your body weight. If you won’t do this for yourself, do it for the one who may have to haul you. Rely on barter and lower your tax profile. Grow at least 20% of your food and join or start a local food cooperative. You don’t have to live in the country to do this, but getting out of big urban centers and away from coastal areas and flood planes is a good idea. Have a circle of people in close proximity whom you would want next to you in a barfight (you must trust them but may not love all of them). Get folks who aren’t on the same page out of your life; keeping not ditto heads, but values sharing and value adding people. Train with your group and learn from real experts (not ticket punchers). Turn off and unplug all electronic devices when not in use. Get rid of stuff you don’t need, wear stuff out and do without or replace stuff with quality, low maintenance, low profile and small footprint tools. Learn how to make stuff you need. Face the consequences of noncompliance. Always have a plan, especially for the unexpected.
2. Give the great reset clowns what they want, with a twist. Learn to live alone and enjoy solitude. Don’t go anywhere you don’t have to, avoid coming in contact with others and reduce consumption to bare essentials. Study, meditate and/or pray a lot. Enjoy silence. Make your own art. Reduce your taxable income and consumption to zero or as close as you can get. Basically, live like a yogi or anchorite.
I believe most people can and should choose option 1. If even 20% do this the efforts of the evil controllers will fail. Keep in mind that the ones paying the biggest penalty in sickness and death are the ones who obeyed the tyrants and their minions.
I personally like option 2 for various reasons. If a significant number, say 5%, were to choose this they would augment and amplify those in group 1.
I’m all for both options but don’t think either should be compulsory.
It doesn’t matter whether the sociopaths release another bioweapon, create climate catastrophe theater, or gin up a different excuse for martial law. Same difference.
